That's me talking to Nicki. I do look like a terrorist, I guess. |
This is the fearsome weapon. |
Nicki Minaj, Security Guard at the Department of Commerce. |
But Nicki didn’t let a little thing like common
sense bother her. She had a position of
power, and she was going to exercise it.
When I asked her why I couldn’t have a small pocket knife, she cracked
her gum, and with one hand on her hip said “‘ummm… it’s too big.” So then I asked what the size regulations
were, and I got the infamous eye-roll of the put-upon African-American woman
and no answer.
So, I decided that rather than winding up in the paper, it was better to
just leave and put my fearsome edged weapon back in my car, which was in the
parking garage of the Reagan Building, just across the street. The Reagan Building is also a federal
building with security at the door. However,
I breezed through this time even though I still had the pocket knife. I asked this security guard about the pocket
knife specifically, and he just shrugged and said it was fine. So I hurried to the garage, put the knife in
the car, and went back across the street to look at the albino alligator with
my family. I found the whole experience
bewildering, and also infuriating. What is
the danger of citizens carrying pocket knives in a federal building? You can’t hijack a building, last I checked.
Why on earth have we lost our minds when it comes to security? The events of September 11, 2001 were
horrific, to be sure, and we should never allow such a thing to occur
again. That being said, we can’t prevent
another terrorist attack by searching for the tools of the last one. This is called “closing the barn door after
the horse has bolted,” as the idiom goes.
The airport is the easiest place to see this, of course. Terrorists will observe the security
apparatus, locate the gap in coverage, and then exploit the gap. They will seldom repeat an exact same tactic,
especially one that depends on surprise.
After the events of 9/11, they couldn’t hijack a plane with a bazooka
and a heavy machinegun. Every passenger
on the plane would rise up and beat them down.
Little old ladies would be bashing them with their walkers. There isn’t a knife in the world big enough
to take over a jet filled with people anymore, not even that giant sword Mel Gibson had in Braveheart. You just can’t
get people to sit down and shut up if they think you’re going to fly the plane
into a building. The days of the
passengers passively complying with hijackers are behind us now, and I’m sure
that the terrorists understand that. It’s
the TSA that hasn’t quite realized it. It’s
time to realistically and pragmatically examine the threat, rather than just a knee-jerk
response to past attempts.
Feel Safer Yet? |
The thing that makes it so retarded is that it is futile. You just can’t stop people from sneaking things onto planes. Even if every single
passenger was stripped naked and cavity-searched, they would find a way. From out-smarting the scanners to bribing the
TSA agents, there is always a way. Take
a long, careful look at those TSA agents the next time you go through the
airport. I’m sure that will fill you
with a sense of security. No, the only
guaranteed thing the technique of trying to find every conceivable weapon accomplishes
is to make the battle for the plane now occur between an armed terrorist and
completely unarmed passengers. Hardly an
improvement.
Richard Reid, Certified Dipshit |
The real thing we should be worried about here is explosives. Hijacking is pretty much a thing of the past,
for the reasons I put forth above. But some
nutball can absolutely make the plane crash and kill all aboard with just a
small amount of explosives, and there is no shortage of nutballs willing to
blow themselves up to make a point. Finding
hidden explosives is a difficult thing to do also, but it is a whole lot easier
and less obtrusive than taking naked x-ray pictures of grandma. The danger posed by explosives is the reason
for the weird rules about how much shampoo or toothpaste you can have in your
carry-on, and for why you can’t have gel shoe inserts (remember the Shoe Bomber?). These rules also seem kind of
arbitrary, but they are actually based on a scientific reason, namely the amount of explosives required to puncture the skin of the aircraft, which makes them
much easier to tolerate. I find it funny that Richard Reid’s crazy ass
was actually foiled by the unarmed passengers and flight attendants around him, and he was physically
subdued despite being six feet four inches tall and weighing more than 200
pounds. It’s a good thing he didn’t have
a nail file on him. What we really needed up there was a cop. If you think about it, why aren't we spending our money on air marshalls? Because we'd rather take a picture of your uncle's junk, I suppose.
The really big question is how much more are we willing to put up with?
The really big question is how much more are we willing to put up with?
No comments:
Post a Comment